In principle there are two major assumptions by the historians on the
person who sanctioned the Masjid construction and history of its
evolution. With respect to the first assumption one concerned source
suggests that Nawab Shaista Khan, the Mughal Subahdar of Bengal who was active between 1664 to 1688 built it in a fortified complex in the early 1680s. Nawab
Shaista Khan is presumed to be Bibi Maryam's father by this source who
named it as token of affection for her daughter after her premature
demise and enshrined her in the complex. Meanwhile the other piece of
assumption advocates that Bibi Maryam was actually wife of IshaKha
Masnad-E-Ala who built both the masjid and the Shrine in the aftermath of her death. The former opinion is much more concrete than the latter since the masjid architecture
is absolutely that of Mughal style. It is also justified by the
historians who have examined the used building materials and applied
construction techniques to learn that both were exercised during the age
of Nawab Shaista Khan's existence. However this masjid has been
acknowledged as one of the prominent surviving Mughal buildings in
Bangladesh despite its limited accommodation. According to the present
masjid authority during its construction only members of both Nawab
Shaista Khan's family and administration formed the Muslim population of
the present day Killarpur area it is situated in. Even as late as the
1950s Hindus almost monopolized the area population where hardly ten
people would appear for the congregational prayer in stark contrast to
the daily hundreds of worshipers who appear for any prayer.
Originally it was built as a usually and extremely tall
single-storied masjid with great emphasis of the vertical qualities
where the three mihrabs
located in the western wall stood from the base of the ground floor to
one-third the height of the first floor. These mihrabs have been
compressed in width and shortened in height; otherwise, they would
structurally relate to the three domes to portray one of the masjid's
prime architectural essences. The remains of the authentic mihrabs are
present in the first floor and rise as much as one-third of its height
in the western wall. In 2001 the first floor was inserted directly in
the Masjid, which all but jeopardized the structural beauty defined by
the relationship between the domes and the mihrabs. After the
construction of the first floor, the beauty of the domes and mihrabs
remain undecipherable where the former's view is completely obstructed
by the roof of the first floor and the latter's size has been greatly
altered. The architecture of the Bibi Maryam Masjid is defined by a
combination of embellishments and proportional adjustment among elements
such as arches, domes, mihrabs etc., all which have been used in a
series of three members. In such elements the middle one is much larger
and more emphasized than those that flank it. For instance the interior
space was roofed by the three domes where the central dome is much
larger than the subsidiary ones located at its either side. In masjids
the use of three domes in such manner is a very distinctive feature of
Mughal style.
There is a tower called Minaret
in Arabic situated at the eastern corner of the main building which was
built during the 1971 Liberation War and has lost its authentic
features due to later repairs which completely modernized it. The
interior hall has simple lateral arches, but the side domes have been
reduced in size by adjusting the thickness of the side walls. The three
domes are embellished with basal leaf imitations and the masjid walls
are fortified. The embellishment of the outer surfaces or walls which in
the contemporary typical Mughal masjids were plaques and floral and
geometric motifs are also untraceable. A veranda has been later added
alongside the first floor due the eastern facade of the masjid to
accommodate more number of worshipers which has marred the beauty of the
masjid. Originally there was an open plaza that adjoined the eastern
facade adding to its beauty and measured 50 feet by 20 feet. The masjid
even though is rectangular in shape but looked more of a square where
the 50 feet width is marginally bigger than its 45 feet breadth.
No comments:
Post a Comment